Canadian Association of Consulting Energy Advisors (CACEA)

  • Home
  • Heat Refuge Calculations

Heat Refuge Calculations

  • 17 Jun 2024 2:48 PM
    Message # 13371243

    I have a question for the group, regarding the BC requirements for keeping a room at 26C. It seems we don't have a specific method to show this, so I want to float this idea and get your thoughts.

    • Using F280-12 room by room software:
      • Design conditions:
        • Set design cooling temperature to 26C
        • Set cooling for all rooms
      • If any of the "habitable rooms" have 0 BTU/hr cooling load, designate that room as the heat refuge
      • The room could be further tested by:
        • Remove cooling for all but the "heat refuge" room
        • Verify cooling load remains at 0 BTU/hr
      • Otherwise, recommend mechanical cooling
      • Limitations:
      • There is some heat transfer between floors, but not between rooms in the same level
      • A room that has no outside components would not have any measurable "heat gain" and would qualify under the above criteria, but likely not count as a real "heat refuge"
      • A heat refuge is meant to hold occupants for an extended period of time; if we model the rooms with occupants, it automatically adds a cooling load
    • What would be a reasonable "proof of heat refuge" for an AHJ?
      • A modified room by room calculation could showcase this, but the targets are currently a bit arbitrary
      • Is there any way to demonstrate a room's target temperature?
        • I.e. can we show in the software that a room stays at a constant temperature?
        • Is there a BTU/hr/ft2 target we could use in lieu of temperature?

    Do you folk have any thoughts on this?


  • 5 Nov 2024 1:00 AM
    Reply # 13427246 on 13371243
    Anonymous

    old post but I thought I would take a wack at this from Alberta.

    The code defines a maximum indoor design temp of 26C. Part 9 designers are required to simply, provide the minimum equipment capacity required to meet this, in one of the rooms. I guess it sounds like a second calculation for a cleverly chosen room with the indoor design temp set at 26 rather than 23.89C. Another way to look at it would be what combination of R values and factors affecting solar correction could be implemented to lower the heat gain to an appreciable level that can be offset with the smallest amount of mechanical conditioning. delta (T + SC / R) x area.

  • 6 Nov 2024 11:06 AM
    Reply # 13427760 on 13371243

    While each municipality/jurisdiction will have their own policies you'll need to determine, the Township of Langley has put out their policy that I expect many others will follow in principle:  Overheating Protection – Requirement 9.33.3.1(2)

    BOABC has also indicated the onus will be on the builder/applicant to provide documentation that they are able to meet the passive cooling requirement which often will mean the services of a registered professional (outside the scope of EA's).  From my understanding, only northern regions of BC will likely be able to meet the ability of passive cooling. 

    Also, see BSSB bulletin B24-08: Information Bulletin B24-08

    Last modified: 6 Nov 2024 11:10 AM | Graham Knights
© 2020 CACEA - Canadian Association of Consulting Energy Advisors. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software