Looking for some procedural clarification as I have asked this question a couple of times to various parties, yet to get an official answer/commitment.

How are other EAs handling the pre & post blower door testing requirements which either renovations were previously performed, and/or when retrofits performed did not change the building envelope (ie. mechanical or renewables)?

Looking forward to thoughts of all.

Note if renovations were done before the audit - they are not eligible for the grant. They have to have had an audit prior to making any changes to be eligible. 

Even though the envelope 'has not changed', penetrations may have been added, patched, or altered during the completed work. Not only is it required in ERS, but it can help identify any work deficiencies as a best practice.

Wayne, not completing the second BD would lead me to question the EA's intensions. Why? And who does it benefit?

That was a great answer David (Reply # 10955910 on 10792066) and good topic to bring up Wayne.  Ideally everyone follows the ERS procedures but some programs may allow for their own interpretations, but it would be up to an EA to ensure they know them and the consequences f o r not following. Greener Homes two visits two blower doors is a must as the program currently stands.  We could ask the question to NRCan though " what if we know the envelope did not change (eg.  perhaps the case for Solar panel installation).l is a second blower door required"?